Shark and Roborock are two of the most popular vacuum brands on the market. Both offer a range of upright, stick, handheld, and robot vacuums packed with innovative features.
But which brand offers the best performance and value? Here is a detailed comparison of Shark Vs. Roborock vacuums.
A Brief Comparison Table
| Features | Shark | Roborock |
| Price Range | $100 – $500 | $400 – $700 |
| Types of Vacuums | Upright, stick, handheld, robot | Robot only |
| Suction Power | Up to 1500W | 2000Pa max |
| Runtime | Up to 80 mins | Up to 180 mins |
| Navigation | VS.LAM navigation (select models) | Lidar navigation |
| Mapping | – | Multi-level mapping |
| Carpet Performance | Great with powered brushrolls | Good with main brushes |
| Hard Floor Cleaning | Good with hard floor attachments | Excellent with mopping features |
| Smart Features | WiFi, app control, Alexa/Google support | App control, scheduling, no-go zones, auto-empty dock |
Overview of Shark Vacuums
Shark is one of the most popular vacuum brands in the US. They offer a wide range of corded stick vacuums, uprights, handhelds, and cordless stick models across various price points.
One of their biggest strengths is consistent powerful suction performance thanks to Shark’s patented Anti Hair Wrap technology that removes hair from the brushroll.
Their DuoClean head is also great at cleaning both carpets and hard floors in one pass. Higher-end Shark vacuums also come with convenient features like WiFi connectivity, app and voice control, and self-cleaning brushrolls.
Overview of Roborock Vacuums
Roborock is a Chinese brand that focuses exclusively on robot vacuums and mops. Their vacuums use advanced laser-guided LiDAR navigation which allows for efficient cleaning patterns and multi-level mapping.
Suction power is also impressive, with most models touting 2000Pa max. Mopping performance is excellent thanks to the vibrating mop pads that scrub floors.
Roborocks also have large dust bins, long battery life up to 180 minutes, and auto-recharge and resume. They connect via app for scheduling, zoning, and other smart home integration.
Also Read: Comaprison Between Miele and Roomba
Key Differences Between Shark and Roborock
Shark and Roborock take quite different approaches when it comes to vacuum design and functionality. Here are some of the major differences:
1. Types of Vacuums
Shark is like the Swiss Army knife of vacuum cleaners. They don’t just make one kind; they have a whole arsenal: uprights for deep cleaning, stick vacuums for quick tasks, handheld ones for tight spaces, and robots for automated cleaning. This means if you have varied cleaning needs, Shark might be your one-stop solution.
Roborock, on the other hand, focuses mainly on robot vacuums. This focus has allowed them to perfect the robot vacuuming experience, but it does mean their range is limited to only that. If you’re specifically interested in robot vacuums, Roborock is a brand tailored for this niche.
2. Suction Power
Think of suction power as the muscle of a vacuum. Shark’s upright and stick vacuums can have up to a whopping 1500W of power. Imagine them like the heavyweights in a boxing match. In the robot category, they max out at around 1000W.
Roborock’s robots, however, come with a max of 2000Pa. When converted, that’s roughly 140W. So, while Shark vacuums generally have the muscle power, Roborock’s robot vacuums are more like agile dancers with enough strength for common tasks.
3. Runtime
Imagine running a marathon. Roborock’s robot vacuums can run (or, well, clean) for up to three hours (180 minutes) before they get tired and go back to their charging stations. In contrast, Shark’s robots might be out of breath in just over an hour (60-80 minutes). However, Shark’s corded options? They can keep going as long as they’re plugged in, never needing a break.
4. Navigation and Mapping
Navigating a room can be tough. Roborock uses LiDAR laser technology, like a high-tech GPS for your home, allowing it to understand the room’s layout and plan efficient cleaning paths. It can even remember different floor maps. It’s like giving your vacuum a map and a plan.
Shark’s robots, on the other hand, are a bit like toddlers. They might bump into things or use cameras to figure out where they’re going. Their navigation is more basic and might not always seem logical, but they get the job done.
Also Read: Comaprison Between the Neato D7 and D8
5. Carpet Performance
Carpets can hide a lot of dirt. Shark vacuums are masters at cleaning carpets. Thanks to their powerful brushrolls and suction, they can dig deep into carpets, pulling out dirt and debris. Models like the Vertex and Apex are champions in this category.
Roborock’s robots are more generalists. While they can handle carpets, they’re better equipped for lighter tasks and are more suited for hard floors.
6. Hard Floor Cleaning
Now, if we talk about hardwood, tile, or laminate, Roborock takes the trophy. Their robot vacuums come with mopping features, and the vibrating mop pads are like a spa treatment for hard floors. They scrub gently but effectively. Some even know to avoid carpeted areas when mopping.
Shark does have the DuoClean feature in some models for hard floors, but if you want to mop, you’ll need to manually attach a wet pad, making the process a bit more hands-on.
Watch This Review Video:
7. Smart Features
In today’s digital age, even vacuums are getting smart. Both Shark and Roborock vacuums can connect to your home’s WiFi. From an app on your smartphone, you can give them commands. But Roborock seems to be a bit ahead in the tech game.
Its app allows users to set no-go zones, create schedules, and even connect to voice assistants like Alexa or Google. In comparison, Shark’s app is like a basic remote control – functional but without the bells and whistles.
8. Price Range
Lastly, let’s talk money. Shark offers a wide price range, starting from budget-friendly to the more high-end models. Whether you have $100 or $500, Shark likely has an option for you.
Roborock, however, caters more to the premium market. Their robots start at around $400, with most ranging between $500 and $700. It’s a bit like comparing a general store (Shark) with a specialty boutique (Roborock).
While Shark provides versatility with a range of vacuum types and often stronger suction, Roborock specializes in advanced robot vacuums with smart features and extended runtime. The choice between the two depends on your specific cleaning needs and budget.
Also Read: Choose Between Eufy 25c And 30c Robot Vacuum.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
For upright, stick, and handheld vacuums, Shark is likely the better option with great cleaning performance across floors and carpets. But Roborock’s robot vacuums and mops outperform Shark’s models with smarter navigation and mopping features.
The Shark EZ is a basic budget robot vacuum while Roborocks are more advanced. The EZ has limited navigation and runtime under an hour. Roborocks map systematically, run for 180 minutes, empty themselves, and mop floors.
Roborock was originally created by Xiaomi as a sub-brand but is now its own company. Their vacuums are still quite comparable though – both focus on technology, long battery life, and lidar navigation. Roborock may have a slight edge in terms of software and mapping.
Shark is better for carpets thanks to superior suction power and brushrolls. iRobot’s Roombas can’t match Shark’s deep cleaning performance on rugs and high-pile carpeting. But Roombas navigate and map a bit more intelligently. So Shark for carpets, iRobot for hard floors.
Also Read: Comparison Between the Neato D6 and D8
Final Thoughts
When choosing between Shark Vs. Roborock, consider your floor type and cleaning needs. Shark offers versatility across upright, cordless, handheld, and robot vacuums.
Their carpet cleaning is unmatched. Roborock specializes in technology-advanced robot vacuums with long battery life and mopping.
You get smarter mapping and hard floor cleaning. Weigh the pros and cons and you can determine which brand fits your home cleaning needs.