Going solar can be a big investment. When deciding between solar panel brands, it’s important to do your research to find the best value and quality. Two popular options are Mission Solar and LG.
But how do they compare? This article will analyze the pros and cons of Mission Solar and LG solar panels to help you make an informed decision.
A Brief Comparison Table
| Comparison | Mission Solar | LG |
| Manufacturing Location | USA | International |
| Panel Efficiency Range | 19.4% – 20.7% | 19.6% – 22.5% |
| Aesthetic Design | White-bordered cells, blue frames | Sleek all-black |
| Warranty | 25 years at 80% output | 25 years at 86% output |
| Product Warranty | 10 years | Up to 15 years |
| Pricing | $$ More affordable | $$$ Premium |
| Availability | Stable, US-based production | Limited, exiting industry |
| Performance | Excellent PTC ratings | Very high efficiency |
| Durability | Durable, weather-resistant | Slightly longer coverage |
| Best For | Budget-conscious buyers | Maximizing efficiency |
Overview Of Mission Solar And LG
Mission Solar is based in San Antonio, Texas and manufactures its solar panels domestically. The company was founded in 2007 and is one of the biggest US-based solar panel producers. Mission Solar panels come with a 25-year power warranty and 10-year product warranty.
LG is a South Korea-based electronics manufacturer that entered the solar panel industry in 1985. LG produces its solar panels internationally in countries like South Korea and the United States. LG offers a 25-year warranty and above-average product warranties up to 15 years for some panels.
However, LG recently announced its exit from the solar panel business by June 2023. So LG panels may be difficult to find or require replacement parts and service from third parties in the future.
Also watch this for details!
Mission Solar Panel Options
Mission Solar produces monocrystalline PERC solar panels ranging from 330-415 watts. Their product line includes:
- MSE PERC Standard Series: 60 and 72-cell options with black or white frames, efficiencies up to 19.9%.
- MSE MONO BLACK: A 72-cell high-efficiency model rated at 415 watts with 20.7% efficiency.
- Bifacial Solar Panels: 72-cell double-sided panels that can generate up to 20% more energy from reflected light.
Mission Solar emphasizes high performance and consistent quality control. Their solar panels are designed to withstand high temperatures and have excellent PTC ratings.
LG Panel Options
LG produces both monocrystalline and polycrystalline solar panels ranging from 340-415 watts. Their NeON series is known for having one of the highest efficiency ratings, up to 22.5% for the NeON R Prime.
Some popular LG solar panels include:
- NeON R: 60-cell monocrystalline PERC panels available in black or white, 340-395 watt range.
- NeON 2: 60 and 72-cell monocrystalline PERC solar panels, high efficiency up to 21.4%.
- NeON R Prime: High efficiency 72-cell monocrystalline PERC rated at 415 watts.
- NeON 2 BiFacial: 72-cell double-sided panel generates up to 25% more energy.
LG panels are aesthetically designed and use ADC technologies for weather resistance. The NeON panels have a sleek all-black look.
Detail Comparison Of Mission Solar And LG
- Efficiency & Performance
When comparing solar panel efficiency, LG tends to lead over Mission Solar. LG’s NeON line rates from 19.6 – 22.5% efficiency, with most models over 20%. Mission Solar lags a bit behind with efficiencies ranging from 19.4 – 20.7%.
However, Mission Solar panels rate highly for PTC performance which measures output at higher temperatures. This can translate to better real-world results in hot climates.
Both brands produce quality solar panels that should perform well. LG edges ahead for peak lab efficiency ratings, but Mission Solar offers competitive performance.
Also Read: Sunrun Vs. SunPower Vs. Tesla Solar: Best Residential Solar.
- Durability & Warranties
Solar panels need to withstand decades of harsh weather conditions. Both Mission Solar and LG use durable component materials and protective glass coatings.
Mission Solar’s warranty provides 25 years of 80% power output coverage. LG also provides 25 years of coverage but at a slightly higher rate of 86% power output. LG extends its product warranty coverage to 15 years for some panels.
When comparing durability, LG offers a slight advantage with its longer product warranty and higher power degradation warranty. Both brands use robust, weather-resistant panel designs.
- Aesthetics
If panel appearance is important, LG panels tend to have a sleeker, high-tech look with all-black cells and minimalist framing. Mission Solar panels use a white-bordered cell design that blends better on rooftops but looks less sophisticated.
LG panel frames also come in an aesthetically pleasing black rather than Mission Solar’s metallic blue. So LG offers more aesthetic customization for those wanting a modern, monochromatic roof installation.
- Cost Analysis
Mission Solar panels are generally less expensive than comparable LG models. Cost savings of 10-20% are typical when comparing standard efficiency panels.
For example, a 385-watt Mission Solar 72-cell PERC panel runs around $215 per panel. LG’s NeON 2 370-watt 72-cell panel goes for around $260.
Of course, panel prices fluctuate frequently. But Mission Solar aims to provide affordable US-manufactured panels, which shows in their competitive pricing. LG’s premium features and efficiency result in a higher price tag.
- Availability Concerns for LG
One downside to LG panels is reduced availability going forward. With LG departing the solar industry, restocking popular panels may be difficult.
Mission Solar plans to continue US-based production, so acquiring additional matching panels is less likely to be an issue. New homeowners may prefer Mission Solar’s stability and domestic sourcing.
Also Read: Comparison Between Direct Energy And Constellation.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Yes, Mission Solar produces high quality, high performing solar panels. As a major US manufacturer, they offer competitive American-made products with good warranties. Their panels rate well for real-world power output.
Popular top solar panel brands include LG, Panasonic, SunPower, and REC for premium panels. Mission Solar, Silfab, and Canadian Solar are quality mid-priced panel brands. No one brand is best overall, but these manufacturers are known for making reliable products.
LG is strategically shifting focus to its electric vehicle component business rather than continuing solar panel production. With intense global competition, LG cited declining profits as solar manufacturing became less financially viable for them long-term.
Mission Solar is not currently ranked as a Tier 1 solar panel manufacturer. However, they produce quality products comparable to tier 1 brands. Their US-based manufacturing and manufacturing quality controls result in reliable, high-performing solar panels.
Also Read: Comparison Between DocuSign And VeriSign.
Verdict: Mission Solar Offers Better Value Overall
For most homeowners, Mission Solar is the better buy. Their US-sourced panels offer competitive quality and performance at a more affordable price point. Warranties are strong though slightly behind LG’s premium coverage.
LG panels do rate higher for lab efficiency and sleek aesthetics. But with LG solar exiting the industry, their future availability is uncertain. At 10-20% less cost, Mission Solar provides better overall value from a reliable American company. Either brand offers reputable solar panels. Their balance of price, quality, and company stability makes them a lower-risk investment for going solar.