Fertility tracking has become increasingly popular among women looking to get pregnant or avoid pregnancy naturally. Two of the most advanced fertility tracking devices on the market are inito and kegg.
But how do these high-tech fertility monitors compare when it comes to accuracy, features and user experience?
This comprehensive guide examines the key differences and similarities between inito and kegg to help you decide which fertility tracker best fits your needs and budget.
A Brief Comparison Table
| Feature | Inito | Kegg |
| Tracking Method | Urinary hormone levels | Transvaginal ultrasound of ovaries |
| Ovulation Prediction | 12-48 hours before | Up to 7 days before |
| Fertility Tracking | Daily fertility score based on hormones | Daily fertility percentage based on follicle development |
| Pregnancy Testing | No | Yes, estimates hCG levels |
| Cost | $159 + $39 per month for test sticks | $299 + replacement wands every 1-2 years |
| Ease of Use | Daily morning urine testing | Regular self-ultrasound scans |
| Prediction Accuracy | 99% claimed in studies | 99% claimed in studies |
| Data Insights | Hormone levels like LH and estrogen | Visual follicle images |
| Portability | Compact and portable | Base station not portable, wand is portable |
Overview of Inito and Kegg Fertility Trackers
Inito
Inito is an FDA-cleared fertility monitor that uses an optical sensor to track the changing hormone levels in your urine across your menstrual cycle.
It measures reproductive hormones like estrogen and luteinizing hormone (LH) to identify your fertile window with a claimed accuracy of 99%.
Inito provides you with a daily fertility score through their app that estimates your likelihood of conception each day.
It also detects the LH surge that precedes ovulation up to two days in advance so you can time intercourse effectively.
Kegg
Kegg is a fertility tracker and pregnancy test system. It uses ultrasound technology to track the changes in your reproductive system during your menstrual cycle.
Kegg measures the follicles that contain the maturing eggs in your ovaries to identify your upcoming ovulation up to seven days in advance.
The Kegg app provides you with a daily fertility score, fertile window predictions and ovulation insights. It also has a built-in pregnancy test that estimates levels of the hCG hormone.
Key Differences Between Inito And kegg
Tracking Method
- Inito is a urinary hormonal fertility monitor that analyzes estrogen and LH levels in your first morning urine.
- Kegg uses transvaginal ultrasound technology to actually visualize your ovaries and follicles during development.
Ovulation Prediction
- Inito detects your LH surge 12-48 hours before ovulation.
- Kegg tracks follicular development and typically predicts ovulation 4-7 days in advance.
Fertility Tracking
- Inito translates hormone levels into a 0-9 fertility score each day of your cycle.
- Kegg uses ultrasound imaging of follicles to provide a daily fertility percentage.
- Both provide insights into your personalized fertile window each cycle.
Pregnancy Testing
- Inito does not have built-in pregnancy testing capabilities.
- Kegg’s ultrasound technology estimates hCG levels, so it doubles as a pregnancy test.
Accuracy
Accuracy is essential for a fertility tracker to be reliable and effective.
- Inito claims 99% accuracy in LH detection in internal studies. Real-world use shows high accuracy, but limited data.
- Kegg also claims 99% accuracy based on clinical studies. Their ultrasound tracking technology is highly accurate when used properly.
- Both devices use advanced technology with medical-grade accuracy for ovulation and fertile window prediction. Independent, large scale studies would be needed to directly compare.
Features and User Experience
Beyond just fertility tracking, what features and user experience do Inito and Kegg offer?
Inito
- Compact, portable urinary scanner
- Clear OLED display screen shows fertility score and cycle details
- Rechargeable battery
- Data syncs to app via Bluetooth
- App provides fertility insights and score, cycle history and analytics
- Optional add-on basal body temperature tracker
- Provides hormone data like LH and estrogen levels
Kegg
- Reusable wand with ultrasound sensor attaches magnetically to base
- Base recharges wand and syncs data to app
- Easy-to-use wand handle for transvaginal ultrasound scanning
- App shows ultrasound follicle images and fertility insights
- Also displays period and ovulation predictions
- Built-in pregnancy testing
- Fully charges in 4 hours for up to 3 months of use
User Experience
- Inito requires daily morning urine testing – easy but daily action needed
- Kegg requires short ultrasound scans multiple times per week
- Both offer clear, easy-to-use apps to understand fertility cycle
- Kegg provides more visual follicle tracking, while Inito focuses on hormone data insights
Cost Comparison
The cost of these advanced fertility tech devices is an important consideration. Here’s how they compare:
- Inito device – $159
- Inito sticks (30 pack) – $39
- Kegg – $299
- Kegg wand replacements – up to $50
The Inito monitor itself is half the upfront cost of Kegg, but you have to continually purchase additional urine testing sticks. Kegg’s higher initial price includes the ultrasound device and several months of use before needing wand replacement.
Over a year of use for conception, Inito would cost around $239, while Kegg would cost $299. For two years trying to conceive, Inito would cost closer to $339, compared to Kegg’s one-time price.
Pros and Cons
| Aspects | Inito | Kegg |
| Pros | – Lower upfront cost – Portable and discreet – Clear fertility insights from hormone data – Easy to use with just urine testing – add-on BBT tracking available | – Ultrasound sees actual follicles and ovaries – Typically predicts ovulation earlier – Built-in pregnancy testing – Reusable wand with long battery life – Clear, easy-to-use app |
| Cons | – Daily morning testing required – Must buy additional test sticks – No pregnancy testing – Slightly less advance ovulation prediction – Doesn’t provide visual follicle tracking | – Higher upfront cost – Transvaginal ultrasounds require more effort – Wand must be replaced after 1-2 years – Limited hormone insights |
Which Is Better for You?: Final Analysis
Best for Cost: Inito
Inito is the most budget-friendly option, making it ideal if you want an affordable but accurate fertility tracking solution. Just keep in mind the ongoing cost of test sticks.
Best for Ease of Use: Inito
For the most convenient, hassle-free tracking, Inito is your best bet. Urine testing is simple and quick. Kegg requires regular transvaginal ultrasounds.
Best for Data: Inito
Inito provides more hormone level details and insights if you like to dive into the data. Kegg instead focuses on visual follicle tracking.
Best for Accuracy: Tie
Both options use medical-grade lab testing technology for accuracy. Independent studies don’t clearly show one as more accurate.
Best for Early Ovulation Prediction: Kegg
Kegg sees follicular development earlier, predicting ovulation up to 7 days in advance – longer than Inito’s LH surge detection.
Best with Pregnancy Testing: Kegg
Kegg doubles as an hCG pregnancy test, saving you from buying additional test kits. Inito doesn’t have this capability.
Also Read: Comparison Between Check My Body Health And Everlywell
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Yes, Inito is an accurate FDA-cleared fertility monitor. Its internal studies show 99% accuracy in detecting the LH surge just before ovulation. Real-world use indicates high accuracy, but larger independent studies are needed.
Ultrasound monitoring done by fertility doctors is considered the most accurate way to track ovulation, because you can directly see the follicles and ovaries. Options like Kegg bring this technology home. But Inito and other urinary hormone trackers can also be highly accurate.
Kegg is worth it if you want to visually track your follicular development and predict ovulation farther in advance. The built-in pregnancy testing also adds value. But the higher price tag may not make it worthwhile if you just want basic fertile window tracking on a budget.
There are no large scale independent studies comparing Inito and Mira accuracy. Both devices use similar urinary hormone tracking technology. Inito seems to provide more detailed fertility insights and scores, while Mira emphasizes convenience. For most women, they will likely be very comparable for accuracy.
The Bottom Line
When it comes to Inito and Kegg, both fertility monitors are accurate options using advanced medical tracking technology. Which is right for you depends on your budget, how early you want ovulation prediction, and whether you prefer convenient urine testing or seeing your actual follicles. Evaluate the key differences and decide whether Inito or Kegg best fits your fertility tracking needs.