Compact cameras like the Sony ZV-1 and Canon G7X Mark III have become extremely popular among vloggers, travel photographers, and everyday users who want excellent image quality without the bulk of a DSLR. But with so many shared features between these flagship compact models, which one should you choose?
In this in-depth comparison, we’ll analyze the key differences between the Sony ZV-1 and Canon G7X Mark III to help you decide which is the best option for your needs and budget. We’ll compare everything from video specs to autofocus performance to design and ergonomics.
A Brief Comparison Table
| Specs / Features | Sony ZV-1 | Canon G7X Mark III |
| Sensor Resolution | 20.1MP | 20.1MP |
| Sensor Size | 1″ Exmor RS | 1″ CMOS |
| Lens (35mm eq.) | 24-70mm f/1.8-2.8 | 24-100mm f/1.8-2.8 |
| Image Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Max Video Resolution | 4K 30p | 4K 30p |
| Flip Screen | Side-flipping vari-angle | Top-flipping tilt |
| Autofocus System | Real-time Tracking & Eye AF | Dual Pixel AF |
| Shooting Speed | 24 fps continuous | 20 fps continuous |
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| WiFi / Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Mic Jack | Yes | Yes |
| Streaming | No | Yes |
| Battery Life | 260 shots | 235 shots |
| Dimensions | 105 x 60 x 44 mm | 105 x 61 x 41 mm |
| Weight | 294g | 304g |
| Price | $800 | $750 |
Overview And Shared Features
The Sony ZV-1 and Canon G7X Mark III have a lot in common, which is why they are direct competitors. Both feature:
- Large 1-inch 20.1MP sensors capable of excellent image quality
- Bright 24-100mm equivalent f/1.8-2.8 zoom lenses
- 4K video recording and external microphone ports
- 180-degree flip touchscreens for vlogging
- Bluetooth and WiFi connectivity
- Compact, lightweight designs with similar control layouts
However, there are some important differences worth examining before choosing one over the other.
Design And Ergonomics
In terms of design philosophy, the Sony ZV-1 is optimized for vlogging while the G7X Mark III takes a more traditional compact camera approach.
The ZV-1 has a side-flipping vari-angle LCD screen that makes it easy to see yourself when filming. The handgrip is also larger and more comfortable for extended filming sessions. Physical buttons are minimized to avoid accidental presses during vlogging.
The G7X Mark III uses a more standard top-mounted flip-up screen. While less ideal for vlogging, it offers more flexibility for overhead or waist-level shooting. The body itself is slimmer but retains a good-sized handgrip and more physical controls. Build quality feels a bit more robust overall.
For portability, the ZV-1 is a hair thinner but the G7X III is lighter. The ZV-1 includes a directional 3-capsule mic while the G7X III has a basic stereo mic. For audio quality, an external mic is recommended with both.
Also Read: Choose Between Panasonic Lumix ZS100 And ZS200.
Video Recording And Features
Both cameras offer unlimited 4K video up to 30fps, and 1080p slow motion up to 120fps. The ZV-1 has a slight edge with higher bitrates in most modes for reduced compression artifacts.
Sony’s strengths lie in its video-centric features and processing. This includes advanced autofocus, better face detection and tracking, faster ZEISS optics, S-Log2 recording, and various profiles for stills and video.
Canon fights back with its excellent Dual Pixel autofocus system, touch-and-drag focus ability, and microphone jack relocation to the body for a more streamlined look. The G7X III also adds live streaming which is missing on the ZV-1.
For videographers and vloggers needing the fastest, most reliable video AF, the ZV-1 easily wins. But the G7X III is no slouch either. Both will handle walked and vlogging-style shooting admirably.
Still Photo Performance
Despite its video-centric design, the ZV-1 is also highly capable for stills. It offers faster burst shooting of 24fps Vs. 20fps on the G7X III. The ZV-1 has faster sensor readout for reduced rolling shutter. Its UHS-I SD card slot outperforms the UHS-I compatible slot on the G7X III.
For autofocus, the ZV-1 employs advanced Real-time Tracking and Eye AF. Face and eye detection are excellent for both humans and animals. The G7X III doesn’t have the same sophistication but its Dual Pixel AF remains quick and reliable.
Ultimately, the ZV-1 has the edge for action and portraits while the G7X III is very capable as a general-use pocket camera. Either model can produce outstanding still images.
Also Read: Choose Between Canon G7X Mark II And Mark III.
Battery Life
With such compact bodies, battery life is mediocre on both cameras. The ZV-1 is CIPA rated for 260 shots or about 70 minutes of video. The G7X Mark III does better at 235 shots or 85 minutes of video. Real-world performance is usually much better than CIPA estimates, but you’ll still want spare batteries for long shoots.
The G7X Mark III uses a higher capacity NB-13L battery pack while the ZV-1 has a smaller NP-BX1. Both support USB charging in-camera. Overall battery performance goes to the G7X III.
Price And Value
The Sony ZV-1 launched at $800 USD body only while the Canon G7X Mark III released at $750. Given similar core features and image quality, the Canon gives you more bang-for-buck but lacks some of Sony’s more advanced tech.
For videographers and vloggers who rely on autofocus and put video first, the ZV-1 is easily worth the small premium. Travel shooters who want well-rounded stills and video can save a bit with the G7X Mark III.
Overall, the ZV-1 offers more cutting-edge features while the G7X III takes a more traditional approach at a lower cost. Choosing between them comes down largely to your shooting priorities and budget flexibility.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Yes, the ZV-1 is arguably the best compact camera specifically designed for vlogging and selfie-style video. Its vari-angle screen, excellent video AF, directional mic, and dedicated profiles make it an ideal choice for the job.
Definitely. Despite its video-centric marketing, the G7X Mark III is a highly capable pocket camera for travel, street, and everyday photography as well. It delivers great looking 20MP still images in a slim, portable body.
The G7X Mark III is very capable for vlogging thanks to its 4K resolution, external mic jack, and flip screen. However, the side-mounted screen and superior autofocus of the ZV-1 make that a better specialized choice.
Yes, the ZV-1 is an excellent compact portrait camera. It offers beautiful background blur, great skin tones, fast Eye AF and tracking, and overall fantastic image quality in a small package. The directional 3-capsule mic nicely captures audio too.
Also Read: Is Sony FX30 Better Than A7SIII?
Conclusion
The Sony ZV-1 and Canon G7X Mark III deliver outstanding performance and image quality from highly compact designs. While their core features are similar, the ZV-1 aims squarely at vloggers with its video-centric design and features. The G7X Mark III appeals to a broader audience seeking great stills and video in a pocketable form factor at a lower price point.
Ultimately your choice between these impressive compacts should come down to your preferred shooting style. Vlogging demands make the ZV-1 the ideal option despite the higher cost.
For travel and general use, the more affordable G7X Mark III gets you 90% of that experience for less. Either way, it’s hard to go wrong with these category-leading point-and-shoots.