Merrick Vs Taste of the Wild: My Real-Life Comparison After Feeding Both to My Dogs for Over a Year

I’ve been on a mission to feed my two dogs the best possible food for more than ten years now—testing dozens of brands, watching how each one affects their energy, coat, stool quality, weight, and vet checkup results. When I compared Merrick and Taste of the Wild head-to-head, I was looking for an honest answer to which one actually delivers better everyday performance for active, middle-aged dogs with occasional sensitivities.

My main intent here is to share my firsthand experiences, break down the real pros and cons of each brand, and give you a clear picture so you can pick the one that will most likely keep your dog thriving based on actual results rather than just label promises.

A Brief Comparison Table

My Experience With Merrick

I first switched my energetic Lab mix to Merrick Grain-Free Real Chicken & Sweet Potato in early 2025 because he was starting to look a bit soft around the middle despite daily runs.

The bag opened with a rich, roasted-chicken smell that immediately had him circling my legs and drooling on the floor.

He tore into the bowl like it was the best thing he’d ever tasted, crunching so loudly I could hear it from the next room.

Within about ten days his coat started gleaming again; black fur that had been dull now caught every bit of sunlight during walks.

Shedding dropped to almost nothing—previously I’d find black tufts everywhere, but after Merrick it was just light dusting on the couch. I transitioned slowly over ten days to be safe, and there was zero loose stool, gas, or refusal.

When I tried the Backcountry line with freeze-dried raw bits mixed in, he literally pawed through the kibble to get the raw pieces first every meal. His energy on our longer hikes stayed rock-solid—no panting heavily or begging to turn around halfway.

Muscle tone sharpened noticeably around his shoulders and haunches; he looked more athletic within a couple of months. My older mixed-breed rescue, who had mild morning stiffness, started jumping onto the bed with far less hesitation after three weeks.

For my younger dog who gets itchy ears on chicken foods, the lamb formula almost completely stopped the scratching and head-shaking. I rotated beef, salmon, chicken, and lamb every four to six weeks, and he never once turned his nose up at any bowl.

Kibble size was perfect for both dogs—no gulping issues or leftovers. Vet visits showed stable weight, strong bloodwork, and no protein-handling concerns.

Bags stored in a sealed bin stayed fresh even through humid summers with no mold or off smells. The higher price stung when buying two large bags a month, but fewer vet calls for skin issues and better overall condition made it feel worth every cent.

U.S. sourcing and company-owned facilities gave me more confidence in batch consistency. The occasional “natural flavors” line on labels nagged me a little, but overall the transparency was solid.

When I briefly tested another brand for comparison, both dogs’ stools loosened noticeably within days, reminding me how well Merrick suited their digestion. My senior stayed regular with zero bloating even after richer dinners.

Picky phases that used to last days vanished—the meaty aroma pulled them to the bowl instantly. Freeze-dried bits turned routine meals into something they genuinely looked forward to.

After more than a year alternating lines, Merrick became the reliable baseline that kept both dogs looking great, feeling strong, and acting happy every single day.

Also read: My Thoughts On Nutrisource Puppy Food

My Experience With Taste of the Wild

I introduced Taste of the Wild High Prairie (bison & venison) to the rotation in mid-2025 after friends raved about the novel proteins and lower price point compared to Merrick.

The bag had a deep, smoky-roasted meat scent with hints of sweet potato that had both dogs sitting politely but intently while I portioned it out.

They dove in eagerly, chewing more slowly than usual because the kibble felt denser and meatier in their mouths.

Coat shine appeared within the first week; fur felt softer and looked healthier under indoor lights.

Shedding stayed light even during seasonal changes—previously I’d vacuum twice a week, but on Taste of the Wild it was once every ten days or so. Transition over seven days went smoothly with no digestive upset at all.

The roasted-meat focus really showed; both dogs cleaned bowls completely without any coaxing. Energy on weekend hikes remained steady and strong—no mid-trail slowdowns or fatigue.

My senior dog’s joint comfort held up well; he trotted up trails with the same enthusiasm as the younger one. For the allergy-prone dog, the bison/venison formula kept ear redness and paw licking at bay most of the time.

I rotated High Prairie, Pacific Stream (salmon), Sierra Mountain (lamb), and Wetlands (fowl) monthly, and interest stayed high—no refusals ever. Kibble sizing worked fine for both sizes without fast-eating problems.

Vet checkups continued showing good weight control, solid blood panels, and no major flags. Bags stored in a cool pantry corner remained fresh throughout.

The noticeably lower cost per pound helped the budget a lot while still feeling premium. Novel proteins gave variety without common allergens.

Newer Ancient Grains lines with roasted sorghum and millet appealed when I wanted to include grains for heart-health reasons. Short side-by-side tests against Merrick showed slightly softer but still acceptable stools.

My senior handled the richer recipes without gas or loose movements. The smoky aroma drew them instantly every feeding.

Overall, Taste of the Wild proved reliable, palatable, and cost-effective—great for maintaining health without the premium price tag of some competitors.

Pros Of Merrick

• High protein levels: Frequently hits 30-38% in Backcountry and core recipes, providing strong support for muscle maintenance, quick exercise recovery, and consistent all-day energy without heavy reliance on carbohydrate fillers that can contribute to gradual weight gain over months. The animal-protein dominance delivers excellent amino acid balance for better strength and stamina in active breeds. Visible muscle definition around shoulders, chest, and hindquarters often appears within weeks to months of consistent feeding. The formulation suits high-energy lifestyles while remaining appropriate for most adult dogs long-term. Owners frequently report more enthusiasm during play, training, and outdoor activities without mid-day crashes.
• Freeze-dried raw bits: Adds authentic freeze-dried raw meat pieces in select lines, dramatically boosting palatability and delivering highly bioavailable nutrients that improve coat shine, skin health, and overall vitality without upsetting most stomachs. The bits act as natural meal enhancers that turn picky eaters into enthusiastic finishers. Textural contrast makes every bowl more interesting and rewarding. Nutrient absorption feels more efficient, leading to firmer stools and steadier energy patterns. The feature elevates routine feeding into something dogs genuinely look forward to each day.
• Broad novel-protein variety: Offers lamb, duck, venison, rabbit, and other single-source options that make managing food allergies and sensitivities much easier by avoiding common triggers like chicken or beef. Dogs with chronic itching, ear issues, or paw licking often show rapid symptom improvement after switching to an appropriate novel-protein Merrick recipe. Skin clarity increases, redness fades, and scratching behaviors drop significantly. Coat quality becomes softer and more resilient during seasonal changes. Rotation keeps diets interesting without introducing new irritants. Veterinary reports often reflect fewer flare-ups and reduced need for medications.
• Joint-support ingredients: Includes meaningful levels of glucosamine and chondroitin in most adult and senior formulas, promoting better mobility and comfort especially in aging or athletic dogs who move more freely over time. Morning stiffness decreases noticeably. Jumping onto furniture or climbing stairs becomes smoother and less hesitant. Cartilage health appears better protected long-term. Pain-related behaviors such as reluctance to play fade gradually. The proactive support shows in sustained activity levels and quality of life.
• Probiotics and digestive aids: Many recipes incorporate probiotics and prebiotic fibers that foster healthy gut flora, leading to consistently firm, well-formed stools that indicate excellent nutrient absorption and microbiome balance. Bloating and gas occur rarely even after richer meals. Digestion runs smoothly from one day to the next. Immunity benefits indirectly through better gut health. Overall wellness feels more stable and predictable with fewer minor tummy complaints.

Pros Of Taste of the Wild

• Novel roasted-protein focus: Uses bison, venison, roasted lamb, salmon, and other unique meats as primary ingredients, delivering excellent amino acid profiles and high palatability that appeal strongly to dogs who struggle with more common chicken or beef-based foods. The roasting process intensifies natural flavors, making meals highly attractive without artificial enhancers. Dogs often clean bowls completely even when transitioning from pickier foods. Protein quality supports good muscle tone and energy without excessive plant fillers. The approach provides real variety for rotation while avoiding common allergens.
• Probiotics included: Adds guaranteed live probiotics (K9 strain) to support digestive health and nutrient uptake, resulting in firmer stools and reduced instances of loose movements or gas in most dogs. Gut balance improves noticeably over the first few weeks. Regularity becomes more predictable even during diet changes. Immunity gains indirect support from a healthier microbiome. The feature adds everyday reliability without needing separate supplements.
• More affordable premium pricing: Positions itself as a lower-cost alternative among high-meat, grain-free (or ancient-grain) options, allowing owners to feed a quality novel-protein diet without the higher monthly expense of ultra-premium competitors. Large bags stretch further for multi-dog homes or larger breeds. Value perception remains strong given the real-meat-first formulation. Budget-conscious owners still get meaningful nutrition without major compromises. The pricing makes consistent high-quality feeding more accessible long-term.
• Ancient Grains options: Newer Wholesome Grains lines include roasted sorghum, millet, quinoa, and other gluten-free grains that align with current veterinary recommendations for heart health while maintaining high protein and palatability. Grain inclusion helps balance taurine and other nutrients naturally. Energy from complex carbs sustains activity longer. Digestion adapts smoothly for non-sensitive dogs. The choice broadens suitability in light of ongoing grain-free discussions.
• High palatability across lines: Dogs typically devour Taste of the Wild enthusiastically from the first bowl thanks to the roasted-meat aromas and meat-forward recipes that keep interest high even after months of use. Refusals are rare even during flavor rotations. Mealtime excitement persists consistently. The appeal makes feeding routine and stress-free for owners. Satisfaction levels stay elevated long-term.

Cons Of Merrick

• Higher price point: Sits at the upper end of the premium category, making monthly costs noticeably higher when feeding multiple large dogs or buying 25–30 lb bags regularly. The expense becomes especially apparent during bulk purchases or when budgets tighten. While health benefits often justify the investment for many owners, the upfront hit can feel significant. Value perception varies depending on household finances and priorities. Long-term savings through reduced vet visits or grooming may offset costs for some, but not everyone sees that immediate return.
• Grain-free lines still prevalent: Despite offering Healthy Grains options, many popular Merrick recipes remain grain-free, leading some veterinarians to recommend caution amid ongoing FDA investigations into potential links between certain grain-free diets and dilated cardiomyopathy in predisposed breeds. The discussion continues among cardiologists and nutritionists. Owners of at-risk breeds may feel uneasy about long-term grain-free feeding. The Healthy Grains line mitigates this concern, but not all Merrick users choose it. Regular cardiac screening becomes a prudent step for some.
• Occasional vague ingredient terms: Some bags include “natural flavors” without full disclosure of exact sources or composition, which frustrates owners who demand complete transparency in every listed component. The ambiguity stands out on otherwise clear labels. While not widespread, it appears enough to be noted repeatedly. Some worry it could conceal less desirable processing aids or by-products. Full specificity would further elevate trust.

Cons Of Taste of the Wild

• Multiple past recalls: Has experienced several recalls over the years—including the 2007 melamine event, 2012 salmonella issues, and others—raising ongoing questions about quality control consistency despite improvements since then. The history lingers in online discussions and vet conversations. Trust can take time to rebuild fully for cautious owners. While recent years show a cleaner record, the pattern prompts some to choose brands with fewer incidents. Safety vigilance remains higher for some.
• Lower average protein in many recipes: Standard lines often range 25-29% protein, trailing behind higher-protein competitors like Merrick in muscle support and sustained energy for very active or working dogs. The difference becomes noticeable in high-demand situations. Plant proteins (peas, lentils) sometimes help boost totals but dilute animal-source dominance. Expectations may need adjustment for performance-oriented pets. Protein focus varies across formulas.
• Grain-free majority: Most core recipes remain grain-free, drawing scrutiny in light of FDA grain-free/DCM investigations (though causation not proven for Taste of the Wild specifically). Veterinary caution persists for certain breeds or predisposed dogs. Ancient Grains options help address this, but they are newer and less widespread. Awareness and heart monitoring become important for long-term users. The debate influences many choices today.

Maintenance Tips For Merrick

• Store in cool, dry, airtight conditions: Keep unopened and opened bags in a dark pantry away from heat sources and humidity to preserve fats, proteins, and vitamins that degrade quickly in poor environments. Transfer to heavy-duty airtight containers or vacuum-seal portions immediately after opening to prevent moisture causing mold, clumping, or rancidity in humid climates. Regular visual and smell checks catch any off odors or discoloration early. Proper storage ensures every scoop retains maximum nutritional value. This habit maximizes the return on each premium bag purchased.
• Weigh portions on a digital scale daily: Use a precise kitchen scale instead of volume scoops because calorie-dense Merrick recipes can lead to gradual weight gain if portions are overestimated even slightly over weeks. Adjust servings based on current activity, age, body condition score, and monthly weigh-ins to maintain ideal weight and prevent joint stress. The accuracy helps balance intake with expenditure, especially for seniors or less active dogs. Consistent weighing eliminates guesswork and supports metabolic health long-term.
• Transition slowly over 7–10 days: Mix increasing amounts of Merrick with the previous food over at least seven and preferably ten full days to allow gut flora to adapt to different proteins, fats, and fibers without diarrhea, vomiting, or refusal. Start at 25% new food and increase incrementally while monitoring stool, appetite, and energy daily. The gradual method minimizes stress and digestive upset that can occur even with excellent foods. Patience during this phase prevents unnecessary issues for both dog and owner.
• Monitor body condition monthly: Perform hands-on body condition scoring every four weeks, feeling ribs and waist to adjust portions if seasonal activity changes or metabolism slows. Visual cues and palpation confirm whether the dog stays lean and muscular. Early detection of weight shifts prevents obesity-related problems. The routine keeps nutrition aligned with real needs. Vet input during annual exams complements this practice effectively.
• Clean bowls thoroughly after every meal: Wash feeding bowls with hot soapy water daily to remove food residue that can harbor bacteria and potentially contaminate fresh portions. Hygiene prevents odors and bacterial growth. The simple step safeguards health and maintains freshness appeal. Routine integration makes it effortless. Cleanliness supports overall wellness.

Maintenance Tips For Taste of the Wild

• Keep bags sealed in low-humidity storage: Store unopened and opened bags in a cool, dry pantry away from sunlight and heat to protect fats and probiotics from degradation and maintain kibble crispness over the bag’s life. Roll the top tightly or transfer to airtight containers immediately after opening to block moisture that causes clumping or mold in humid conditions. Regular checks for off smells or appearance prevent problems. Proper storage preserves the live probiotics and overall quality. This habit ensures consistent nutrition from first scoop to last.
• Measure portions accurately with a scale: Weigh meals on a digital scale rather than relying on cup estimates because calorie density can vary across flavors and lead to unintended weight gain if portions creep upward over time. Adjust servings according to activity level, age, spay/neuter status, and monthly body condition assessments. Precision supports easier weight management for less active dogs. The practice eliminates variability and promotes steady health.
• Introduce gradually over 7 days minimum: Blend Taste of the Wild into the previous diet in increasing proportions over at least seven days to allow the digestive system to adjust to novel proteins, roasted flavors, and fiber sources without loose stools or gas. Monitor stool quality, energy, and appetite closely during the switch. The slow transition minimizes upset and ensures smooth acceptance. Patience yields positive long-term results.
• Observe stool and energy daily: Watch for firm, small stools as a sign of good absorption and probiotic effectiveness; any changes can signal portion or transition adjustments needed. Consistent energy levels indicate proper balance. Daily observation provides immediate feedback on how well the food suits the dog. The habit helps catch minor issues early. Regular tracking confirms ongoing suitability.
• Provide constant fresh water access: The high-protein and novel-meat content naturally increases thirst, so unlimited fresh water supports kidney function and hydration especially during warm weather or exercise. Refresh bowls multiple times daily. The habit prevents dehydration and aids digestion. Water intake encourages optimal nutrient utilization. Hydration remains a simple but critical maintenance step.

Read more: My Experience With Taste of the Wild Dog Food

Comparison With Other Brands

• Purina Pro Plan Purina Pro Plan stands out for its extensive published AAFCO feeding trials across life stages and breeds, giving veterinarians strong confidence in long-term nutritional adequacy and safety that neither Merrick nor Taste of the Wild currently matches with similar documented studies. My dogs always showed glossier coats, firmer stools, and higher sustained energy on both Merrick and Taste of the Wild thanks to the real-meat-first, no-filler approach that feels more premium and natural compared to some Purina recipes that include more grains or by-products. Purina offers much wider availability and lower overall cost, making it easier to feed consistently without budget strain. The science-backed reliability appeals strongly to owners who prioritize evidence over ingredient marketing. For general feeding without special sensitivities, Purina provides dependable results. Many vets still lean toward it for risk-averse recommendations. The comparison highlights different priorities—proven data versus visible premium appearance and performance.
• Orijen Orijen pushes protein levels even higher (often 38-42%) with a heavier emphasis on fresh/raw regional ingredients and WholePrey inclusions that mirror Acana’s philosophy but at a steeper price point and more intense gamey aroma. Acana delivers nearly identical quality and results at a more accessible cost while remaining gentler on sensitive digestion in my rotations. Merrick’s freeze-dried raw bits provide comparable palatability excitement without reaching Orijen’s premium pricing or strong scent that some dogs and owners find overwhelming. Orijen excels for ultra-high-performance or raw-leaning dogs but can be excessive for average active pets. Both Taste of the Wild and Merrick offer excellent middle-ground options with strong real-world results. Practicality and value frequently favor Taste of the Wild or Merrick depending on budget and specific needs.
• Wellness Core Wellness Core matches the grain-free probiotic emphasis and high-protein goals of many Taste of the Wild recipes but lacks the freeze-dried raw infusion that makes Merrick meals more engaging and nutrient-dense in direct comparisons over several months. Acana’s WholePrey fresh/raw focus produced slightly steadier digestion and joint comfort than Wellness Core in side-by-side use where my dogs occasionally showed softer stools on Wellness. Wellness remains a clean-ingredient contender with good variety. The differences appear subtle but become noticeable in long-term coat shine and muscle tone. Palatability and performance often lean toward Merrick or Taste of the Wild. Personal preference and individual dog response ultimately decide the winner.
• Blue Buffalo Blue Buffalo offers a wide variety of lines including LifeSource Bits for antioxidant support and targeted formulas for weight management or sensitivities, but its multiple past recalls (vitamin D excess, mold, etc.) and mixed vet perception make it less consistent in owner confidence compared to Taste of the Wild’s more recent clean run or Merrick’s stronger protein density. My dogs showed comparable coat shine and energy on Taste of the Wild and Merrick, with Taste of the Wild edging out on cost and Merrick winning on raw appeal. Blue Buffalo’s accessibility in stores is excellent. The brand’s controversies linger for some despite solid performance in many homes. Ingredient quality feels similar across the three but safety history and protein levels create clear differentiation.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Conclusion

I’ve fed plenty of premium brands over the years, and both Merrick and Taste of the Wild consistently deliver real, visible benefits that keep my dogs looking great and feeling strong day after day. You know your own pup’s quirks, energy levels, and any sensitivities better than anyone—so trust what you see in their coat, stool, and attitude, start with small bags of each, watch closely, and check in with your vet to make the final call. Pick the one that makes their tail wag harder and their step lighter—you’ll both feel the difference every single day.