I’ve been juicing for years, chasing that perfect glass of vibrant, nutrient-packed juice. When it came time to upgrade my juicer, I narrowed my search to two standout models from Hurom’s Easy Clean Series: the H200 and the H400. Both promise ease, efficiency, and top-tier juice quality, but which one truly delivers? In this article, I’ll share my hands-on experience, comparing their features, pros, and cons to help you decide which juicer fits your lifestyle. From design to cleanup, I’ll break it all down to guide your choice.
Comparison Table: Hurom H200 Vs. Hurom H400
| Feature | Hurom H200 | Hurom H400 |
| Type | Slow Juicer | Slow Juicer |
| Chamber Capacity | 400 ml | 550 ml |
| Auger Speed | 50 RPM | 90 RPM |
| Motor | 150W A/C | 150W A/C |
| Hopper Chute Opening | 50 mm | 45 mm |
| Pulp Container | Integrated, nesting | Integrated, nesting |
| Juice Container | Cup | Cup |
| Noise Level | 60-65 dB | 60-64 dB |
| Sorbet Capability | Yes, with smoothie strainer | Yes, no separate strainer needed |
| Strainer Options | Fine, coarse, smoothie | Built-in multi-screw auger |
| Weight | 14.3 lbs | 14.8 lbs |
| Dimensions | 7.1 x 9.8 x 17.7 inches | 6.6 x 10.3 x 18.5 inches |
| Warranty | 10 years (motor), 2 years (parts) | 15 years (motor and parts, post-Sept 2024) |
| Price (Approx.) | $499 | $599 |
My First Impressions Of The Hurom H200 And H400
When I unboxed the Hurom H200 and H400, I was struck by their sleek, modern designs. Both juicers exude quality, with sturdy builds and polished finishes that look great on any kitchen counter. The H200, in its elegant white, felt compact and lightweight, while the H400’s titanium gray gave it a slightly more premium vibe. I could tell right away that Hurom wasn’t messing around—these machines are built to last.
Setting them up was a breeze. The H200 has five parts that snap together with clear alignment markers, making assembly intuitive even without the manual. The H400, with its innovative multi-screw auger, was even simpler, requiring just three pieces to get going. I was eager to see how these juicers would perform in action, so I loaded them up with a mix of apples, celery, and kale to put them to the test.
Design And Build Quality
The design of a juicer matters more than you might think—it’s not just about looks but how it fits into your daily routine. The H200 is compact, with a footprint of 7.1 x 9.8 x 17.7 inches, making it ideal for smaller kitchens. Its integrated pulp container tucks neatly into the back, keeping things tidy. At 14.3 pounds, it’s easy to move if you need to store it.
The H400, while slightly larger at 6.6 x 10.3 x 18.5 inches, feels more substantial at 14.8 pounds. Its pulp container is also built-in, but the overall design is more streamlined, with a modern edge that screams sophistication. I noticed the H400’s base felt rock-solid during operation, with no wobbling even when juicing tough ingredients like carrots.
Both juicers are made with BPA-free materials, which gave me peace of mind knowing my juice would be free of harmful chemicals. The H400’s second-generation multi-auger design caught my eye—it’s a step up from the H200’s traditional auger, promising easier cleaning and durability. But would it deliver in practice? I was about to find out.
Also read: My Thoughts on Vida Sana Blender Vs. Vitamix.
Ease Of Use: Self-Feeding Magic
One of the biggest selling points for both the H200 and H400 is their self-feeding hoppers. I’m no stranger to juicers that require constant pushing and prodding, so this feature was a game-changer. The H200’s 50 mm chute is slightly wider than the H400’s 45 mm, allowing me to toss in whole apples and large chunks of produce with minimal prep. I loaded the H200’s 400 ml hopper with a mix of fruits and veggies, flipped the switch, and walked away. The auto-cut function did the rest, chopping and feeding ingredients into the auger without any fuss.
The H400 takes this a step further. Its 550 ml hopper is noticeably larger, letting me batch-juice enough for two to three servings in one go. The blades at the bottom of the hopper slice through produce effortlessly, so I didn’t need to pre-cut anything except leafy greens. I loved that I could load it up, start it, and go about my morning routine while it worked its magic. For busy folks, this hands-off approach is a lifesaver.
However, the H200’s hopper felt a tad easier to load due to its wider opening. With the H400, I occasionally had to adjust larger pieces to fit, but it was a minor inconvenience. Both juicers are intuitive, but the H400’s larger capacity gives it an edge for those juicing for a family or meal-prepping.
Juice Quality And Yield
The real test of any juicer is the juice it produces. I ran identical batches of produce—500 grams of celery, a couple of apples, and a handful of kale—through both machines to compare. The H200, with its 50 RPM auger, produced a vibrant, nutrient-rich juice with a thicker, pulpier texture. The fine strainer kept most pulp out, but I noticed a bit more sediment compared to other juicers I’ve used. Using the coarse strainer, I got a pulpier juice that my fiber-loving friend adored, but I preferred the smoother output of the fine strainer.
The H400, running at 90 RPM, surprised me with its clarity. Its multi-screw auger design minimizes pulp, producing a smoother juice with less foam. However, the higher speed slightly reduced the juice yield compared to the H200, especially with leafy greens like kale. For celery, the H200 edged out slightly with a 5-10% higher yield, but the H400’s juice tasted just as fresh and retained vibrant colors, indicating minimal oxidation.
Both juicers excel at preserving nutrients thanks to Hurom’s Slow Squeeze Technology, which minimizes heat and oxidation. If you’re after maximum yield, especially for greens, the H200 might be your pick. But if you prefer a cleaner, less pulpy juice, the H400 delivers.
Cleaning: The Make-Or-Break Factor
Cleaning is where most juicers lose me. I’ve abandoned machines in the past because scrubbing tiny mesh screens felt like a second job. The H200 and H400, part of Hurom’s Easy Clean Series, promised to change that. I was skeptical but hopeful.
The H200 lived up to its name. With no mesh screen, I only had to rinse the auger, hopper, and juice cup under warm water. The included brush helped with stubborn pulp, but it took me about two minutes to clean everything. The H400 was even faster—often under a minute. Its multi-screw auger has no tiny holes to scrub, and the pulp exit area, while occasionally tricky to rinse thoroughly, didn’t require much effort.
One downside with the H400 is that pulp can sometimes stick in the juicing chamber’s connection point, requiring a quick wipe. The H200’s simpler auger design avoids this issue but takes slightly longer to clean overall. If cleanup time is your top priority, the H400 is the clear winner.
Noise Levels: Quiet Enough For Early Mornings
I’m an early riser, and the last thing I want is a juicer that wakes the whole house. Both the H200 and H400 are impressively quiet. Using a decibel meter, I measured the H200 at 60-65 dB, about the level of a normal conversation. The H400 was slightly quieter, averaging 60-64 dB, even when tackling tough produce like beets.
Compared to the centrifugal juicers I’ve used, which can hit 90 dB or more, these slow juicers are a dream. I could juice at 6 a.m. without disturbing anyone, making both models ideal for early birds or shared households.
Sorbet And Versatility
One unexpected perk of both juicers is their ability to make sorbet. The H200 comes with a smoothie strainer that doubles as an ice cream strainer, perfect for processing frozen fruits into a creamy, dairy-free treat. I tossed in frozen mango and got a delicious sorbet in minutes, scooping it right from the pulp container. My kids loved it, and I felt good about serving a healthy dessert.
The H400 doesn’t need a separate strainer for sorbet—it handles frozen fruits straight out of the box. The process is identical, and the results were just as tasty. However, the H200’s strainer options (fine, coarse, and smoothie) give it more versatility for customizing juice texture. If you’re into experimenting with different consistencies, the H200 has a slight advantage.
Durability And Warranty
Durability matters when you’re investing in a premium juicer. The H200 feels sturdy, with a 10-year motor warranty and a 2-year parts warranty. I’ve used mine daily for months without issues, and the build quality suggests it’ll last for years.
The H400 steps it up with a 15-year warranty on both motor and parts (for purchases after September 2024, registered with Hurom Europe). This reflects Hurom’s confidence in the H400’s multi-auger design, which feels more robust than the H200’s traditional auger. Both juicers are built to withstand daily use, but the H400’s extended warranty gives it an edge for long-term peace of mind.
Read More: My Thoughts on NutriBullet Vs. Breville Juicer.
Price And Value
The H200 retails around $499, while the H400 is pricier at $599. The $100 difference comes down to the H400’s larger hopper, faster auger, and easier cleaning. For casual juicers, the H200 offers excellent value—its versatility and solid performance make it a great choice for most households. The H400, however, justifies its price for those who prioritize speed, batch juicing, and minimal cleanup.
I found both juicers to be worth their cost compared to cheaper models that break down or require constant maintenance. If your budget allows, the H400 feels like a premium upgrade, but the H200 holds its own for less.
Pros And Cons Of The Hurom H200
Pros
- Compact Design: Perfect for small kitchens with a smaller footprint than the H400.
- Versatile Strainers: Fine, coarse, and smoothie options let you customize juice texture.
- High Juice Yield: Especially efficient with leafy greens and tough produce.
- Easy to Clean: No mesh screen means cleanup takes about two minutes.
- Sorbet Capability: Makes delicious frozen treats with the included smoothie strainer.
- Quiet Operation: 60-65 dB won’t disturb your household.
- Affordable Price: At $499, it’s a great value for a premium juicer.
Cons
- Smaller Hopper: 400 ml capacity limits batch juicing compared to the H400.
- Pulpier Juice: Fine strainer still lets some pulp through, which may not suit everyone.
- Shorter Warranty: 10 years on the motor, but only 2 years on parts.
Pros and Cons of the Hurom H400
Pros
- Large Hopper: 550 ml capacity is ideal for batch juicing.
- Fastest Cleanup: Often under a minute thanks to the multi-screw auger.
- Smoother Juice: Produces clearer juice with less pulp.
- Sorbet Ready: No extra strainer needed for frozen fruit desserts.
- Quiet Performance: 60-64 dB, slightly quieter than the H200.
- Extended Warranty: 15 years on motor and parts (post-September 2024).
- Premium Design: Sleek and sturdy, perfect for display.
Cons
- Higher Price: $599 is a bigger investment than the H200.
- Lower Yield for Greens: Slightly less efficient with leafy greens compared to the H200.
- Pulp Buildup: Juicing chamber connection can trap pulp, requiring extra rinsing.
My Real-World Experience
To get a true sense of these juicers, I used them daily for a month, juicing everything from soft fruits like oranges to fibrous veggies like celery. The H200 impressed me with its consistency—every batch was flavorful, and the yield was always high. I loved experimenting with the smoothie strainer for thicker juices, which my mom enjoyed for their fiber content. However, I found myself wishing for a larger hopper when juicing for multiple people.
The H400, on the other hand, was a time-saver. I could load it up with produce, start it, and have enough juice for breakfast and lunch in one go. Cleanup was so quick that I never dreaded using it, unlike my old centrifugal juicer. The smoother juice was a hit with my partner, who dislikes pulp, but I noticed a slight drop in yield with kale and spinach compared to the H200.
Both juicers transformed my morning routine, but they cater to different needs. The H200 is perfect for those who want versatility and don’t mind a smaller capacity, while the H400 is a powerhouse for busy folks who value speed and convenience.
Which One Should You Choose?
Choosing between the H200 and H400 depends on your priorities. If you’re a solo juicer or have a small kitchen, the H200’s compact size, lower price, and strainer options make it a fantastic choice. It’s ideal for experimenting with juice textures and maximizing yield, especially for greens.
If you’re juicing for a family or value minimal cleanup and batch processing, the H400 is worth the extra $100. Its larger hopper and scrubless design save time, and the extended warranty offers long-term security. For me, the H400’s convenience edged out slightly, but I still use the H200 when I want to play with pulpier juices or sorbets.
Frequently Asked Questions (Faq)
It depends on your needs. The H400 is best for convenience and batch juicing, while the H200 excels in versatility and yield for greens.
The H400 was launched in 2023.
The H200 is a slow juicer that produces high-yield, nutrient-rich juice and can make sorbets with its smoothie strainer.
The H300 (rebranded as Omega Effortless) has a standard mesh auger prone to clogging, while the H400’s multi-screw auger offers easier cleaning and smoother juice. The H400 also has a larger 550 ml hopper compared to the H300’s 400 ml.
Conclusion
After weeks of testing, I can confidently say both the Hurom H200 and H400 are exceptional juicers that make healthy living easier. The H200 is your go-to if you want versatility, a compact design, and great value. The H400 shines for its speed, larger capacity, and effortless cleanup, perfect for busy lifestyles. Whichever you choose, you’re investing in a machine that delivers fresh, flavorful juice with minimal hassle. Pick the one that fits your kitchen and routine, and you’ll be sipping vibrant juices in no time.