I’ve spent years chasing that perfect swing on the court, testing rackets that promise to transform my game from solid to unstoppable. In this article, I break down the Head Radical and Head Prestige—two icons from the same family that cater to different slices of your playing style.
Whether you’re grinding baselines or charging the net, I’ll share my analytical take on their key features, stacking them up so you can pick the one that fits your arm and ambition.
Feature | Head Radical | Head Prestige |
---|---|---|
Head Size | 98 sq in | 95-98 sq in |
Weight (strung) | 11.0 oz | 11.2 oz |
String Pattern | 16×19 | 18×20 |
Stiffness (RA) | 66 | 62 |
Beam Width | 21-23 mm | 20 mm |
Balance | Head Light | Head Light |
Swingweight | 323 | 325 |
Power Level | Medium-High | Medium-Low |
Spin Potential | High | Medium |
Control Level | High | Very High |
Comfort | High | Very High |
My Experience With Head Radical
I remember the day I strung up my first Head Radical MP—it was a crisp fall morning, the court dew-kissed, and I was itching to see if the hype matched the handle. Coming from a lighter speed frame, the 305-gram unstrung weight felt substantial at first, like slipping into a tailored suit that promised power without bulk.
First swings from the baseline confirmed it: the 98-inch head and 16×19 pattern let me load up on forehands, generating spin that arced beautifully, dipping just inside the lines. No more flats dying early; this racket rewarded my moderate swing with controlled depth.

But it wasn’t all smooth serves.
During a practice set, a crosscourt backhand clipped the frame—the sweet spot forgave most, but that low launch angle bit, sending it skimming the net.
I adjusted by teeing up higher, and soon slices knifed low, forcing my partner to stretch.
Volleys? A revelation. The Auxetic 2.0 in the 2025 model damped vibrations on punchy forehand jams, giving me confidence to poach.
One point, I charged a short ball, blocked a lob return—plow-through kept it deep, setting up the put-away.
Serves evolved too. My flat first delivery gained bite, penetrating corners with the medium stiffness (66 RA) providing pop without wildness. Kick seconds? The open pattern brushed up revolutions that kicked high, turning aces into setup winners.
Doubles shone brightest; quick reactions at net felt nimble, the head-light balance whipping for overheads. Yet, in a league match against a pusher, fatigue crept in—the 11-ounce strung heft taxed my unseasoned arm by set two, balls shortening as endurance waned.
Customization helped: I added 2 grams at three and nine o’clock, bumping swingweight to 328 for stability, and a leather grip evened balance. Post-tweak, returns blocked heavy serves effortlessly, and groundstrokes plowed deeper. Comfort stayed high—no elbow twinges, thanks to the flexible layup.
Over months, it molded to my game: baseline rallies turned aggressive, net approaches bold. It’s not flashy power, but analytical play—placement over brute force. For my 4.0 all-court style, it’s elevated consistency, making me smarter on court. If you’re similar, grab one; it’ll challenge and reward in equal measure.
Read More: Comparison of Rhone And Lululemon
Pros Of Head Radical
- Versatile Power Blend: You get this sweet spot of power that doesn’t overwhelm, letting me crank groundstrokes without the ball sailing long—perfect for those long rallies where I need to dictate pace without overcommitting.
- Spin-Friendly Grip: The 16×19 pattern grabs the ball like a claw, whipping up topspin on my forehand that dips just right over the net; it’s why I could loop high kick serves that opponents chase endlessly.
- Maneuverable Stability: At 11 ounces strung, it swings fast enough for quick reactions at net, yet holds firm against heavy hitters—I’ve blocked returns from big servers and felt the plow-through keep me in control.
- Comfort On Impact: Auxetic tech in the 2025 model dampens vibrations so well that my elbow stays happy after hours; no more that jarring thud that used to sneak up on me mid-match.
- All-Court Adaptability: From baseline bombs to volley punches, it transitions smoothly—last weekend, I mixed slices and drives seamlessly, turning defense into offense without missing a beat.
- Forgiving Sweet Spot: Even off-center hits land deep and consistent; I remember nicking a backhand slice wide, and it still skidded low, buying me time to recover.
- Serve Precision: Flat serves explode with controlled pop, while slice adds wicked curve—my second serve percentage jumped because I could target corners reliably.
- Durability Edge: Graphene construction shrugs off string wear, keeping tension steady longer than my old setups; fewer re-strings mean more court time.
- Aesthetic Appeal: That bold orange pops on the court, boosting my confidence—feels like I’m channeling Agassi’s flair without the mullet.
- Value For Upgrades: Easy to customize with lead tape for extra stability if you’re aggressive; I added a gram at three and nine, and it felt tailored overnight.
The Head Radical isn’t just a racket—it’s like that reliable partner who amps your strengths without demanding perfection. I first picked it up during a club league match, frustrated with a previous frame that felt too stiff on volleys.
Right away, the balance hit me: head-light enough to whip through the air, but weighted to punch through contact. On groundstrokes, the medium stiffness (around 66 RA) delivers power you can shape—my topspin forehands now arc higher, biting the baseline with spin rates that keep opponents guessing. It’s not raw explosion like a Boom, but the controlled pop lets me build points methodically.
Volleying became a joy; the thinner beam at the throat flexes just enough for touch, yet stabilizes against pace. I recall a doubles point where my partner lobbed high—I charged, half-volleyed a dipping pass, and the Radical absorbed the spin without twisting.
Comfort shines here too; Auxetic 2.0 in the yoke and handle filters harsh vibes, making it arm-friendly for my twice-weekly sessions. Spin potential? The open pattern shines on slices and kicks, adding dimension to my serve game—opponents duck under those second serves now.
For intermediates pushing advanced, this racket rewards aggression without punishing errors. It’s forgiving on mishits, thanks to the 98-inch head, yet precise for placement. I strung mine with poly at 52 pounds for bite, and it held up through a tournament weekend.
Compared to lighter teams, the MP model’s 305-gram unstrung weight builds plow-through, ideal for counterpunching. If you’re baseline-heavy, it’ll elevate your consistency; all-court players get versatility. Drawbacks exist, but the pros dominate—it’s why pros like Murray paint-job it for that extra edge. Overall, the Radical elevates your game subtly, making you play better without stealing the show.
Cons Of Head Radical

- Limited Raw Power: If you’re not swinging full tilt, it demands your own pace—my slower days saw flatter shots lacking depth, forcing extra effort.
- Low Launch Angle: The stringbed launches lower than spin-heavy frames, so I had to adjust upward to clear the net consistently on heavy topspin.
- Demands Technique: Off-center hits lose some zip; beginners might struggle with the 98-inch head’s precision requirements during rushed exchanges.
- Net Transition Feel: While stable, it lacks the plush touch for drop shots—my angles felt solid but not as buttery as expected.
- Customization Needed: Stock balance suits most, but aggressive servers like me added handle weight to counter head-light whip on flat bombs.
- String Sensitivity: Poly setups shine for spin, but multifilaments go dead fast, requiring frequent tweaks to maintain control.
- Weight Fatigue: At 11 ounces, long matches tire my arm if I’m not conditioned—doubles sets dragged toward the end.
- Less Forgiveness On Serves: Second serves kick okay, but without perfect brush, they sit up for attacks; no free lunch here.
- Cosmetic Boldness: The neon orange screams attention—great for some, but I prefer subtler looks during serious play.
- Pricey Upkeep: Premium build means higher demo costs; stringing for optimal feel adds to the investment.
No racket’s flawless, and the Head Radical’s quirks remind you it’s built for players who commit. Early on, I loved the control, but power gaps showed in windier conditions—balls died short without my full swing, unlike beefier options. The 66 RA stiffness offers feedback, but low launch meant aiming higher on forehands, a tweak that took sessions to dial.
Technique-wise, it’s unforgiving on mishits; a wide backhand once twisted, costing a point. Net play? Stable for blocks, but drop volleys lacked finesse—the flex helps touch, yet it feels firmer than plush frames.
Serves frustrated initially; flats penetrated well, but kicks needed wrist snap or they’d float. Weight at 323 swingweight shines for stability, but three-setters left me gassed—I’m fitter now, but it highlighted conditioning needs. Strings? Polies bite great at mid-tension, but hybrids softened too soon, muting response.
Customization fixed some: leather grip evened balance for serves. Visually, the orange dazzles, but blends into clay courts oddly. Cost? Quality demands premium strings, bumping expenses. Still, these cons push growth—it’s a coach in frame form, exposing weaknesses to sharpen your edge. If power’s your jam, look elsewhere; for balanced challenge, it toughens you up.
My Experience With Head Prestige
Switching to the Head Prestige Tour felt like trading a sports car for a vintage roadster—sleek, demanding, rewarding only the committed driver. It was mid-summer, tournaments looming, when I demoed the 2023 Auxetic version, drawn by whispers of its surgical control.
Strung at 11.2 ounces, the 95-inch head looked intimidating, but gripping it, the balanced weight promised precision. Baseline drills first: the 18×20 pattern locked shots on rails—my inside-out forehands painted lines, depth controlled without wild bounces.

Challenges emerged quick. A rally against a spinny opponent, and the low-powered response forced full commitment; half-swings popped short, inviting attacks.
I teed higher, and soon slices carved low trajectories, backhands knifing corners.
Volleys transformed: the constant 20mm beam flexed on contact, drop shots kissing tape—the Auxetic yoke damped perfectly, no sting on blocks.
One doubles match, I poached aggressively, half-volleying a pass—stability absorbed pace, placement pinpoint.
Serves? The ultimate test. Flats hummed aces down the T, the dense pattern ensuring no flyers.
Slices curved wickedly, but kicks needed snap—early faults taught timing. Swingweight at 325 stabilized returns; heavy serves rebounded deep, my chip blocking confidently. Comfort ruled—the 62 RA soaked vibrations, my elbow silent after clay grinds. Yet, in a five-setter sim, arm fatigue crept; the heft demanded fitness, pace waning late.
Tweaks unlocked magic: 1 gram in handle quickened net game, 2 at tip amped plow. Post-mod, it fit like an extension—analytical play soared, points built on angles. For my flat-hitting style, it refined edges, errors plummeting. It’s not forgiving, but masterful; if you’re advanced, it’ll sculpt your game.
Pros Of Head Prestige
- Pinpoint Control: The dense 18×20 pattern lets you thread needles—my crosscourt lasers hug lines, turning defense into winners.
- Buttery Feel: Auxetic construction connects you to every fiber, like feeling the ball’s heartbeat; slices glide smooth as silk.
- Supreme Stability: At 325 swingweight, it absorbs pace like a wall—big serves bounce back blocked, no twist.
- Precision Serving: Flat bombs target aces precisely; the 95-inch head demands but delivers surgical accuracy.
- Volley Mastery: Touch shots drop dead; the constant beam flexes for drop volleys that kiss the net tape.
- Arm-Friendly Flex: 62 RA stiffness cushions impacts, keeping sessions pain-free even on hard courts.
- Baseline Command: Low-powered response rewards full swings, building points with depth and angle variety.
- Durable Build: Graphene holds shape through abuse, maintaining tension for consistent feedback.
- Classic Appeal: Timeless black design exudes pro vibes, boosting mental edge in tight sets.
- Customization Haven: Thin beam takes mods well—lead at tip amps plow for aggressive styles.
The Head Prestige Tour has been my shadow on court for seasons, a frame that whispers control in a world of shouting power rackets. I switched to it after a Radical felt too lively, craving that classic precision the line’s famous for since the ’80s.
Unstrung at 305 grams for the Tour, it strings to 11.2 ounces—heady, but the 4-point head-light balance swings true. From the baseline, the 95-inch head and 18×20 pattern shine: my one-handed backhand slices low and vicious, skidding to force errors. No over-spin here; it’s flat-to-drive, placing balls exactly where I visualize.
Volleys? Pure poetry. The 20mm constant beam flexes on contact, giving touch that drops half-volleys dead—the 2023 Auxetic 2.0 update enhanced this, filtering vibes for cleaner feedback. Serves demand technique but repay with placement; my slice out-wide aces T-ed opponents, while flats hummed down the tee. Stability astounds: against 120mph serves, it stood firm, blocking returns deep. Comfort’s elite—the low 62 RA soaks shocks, my wrist thanking me post-match.
For advanced players, it’s a scalpel: analytical shots dissect opponents’ weaknesses. In a recent tourney, I used angles to wrong-foot a basher, the dense pattern ensuring no flyers. Durability? It endures, strings lasting longer under control tension. Visually sleek, it focuses the mind. Mods elevate: I taped 3 grams at 12 o’clock for overhead pop. If control’s your creed, the Prestige refines your craft, making good players great.
Cons Of Head Prestige
- Power Deficit: You generate every ounce—no free pop, so slower swings yield short balls that sit up.
- Small Sweet Spot: The 95-inch head punishes mishits; off-center forehands floated wide early on.
- Spin Ceiling: 18×20 limits topspin height—my loops cleared nets barely, lacking Radical’s bite.
- Maneuverability Hurdle: 325 swingweight feels hefty on quick stretches; doubles reactions lagged initially.
- Serve Effort: Kick serves flatten without brush; demands wrist snap or they lack curve.
- Steep Adjustment: From forgiving frames, the flex (62 RA) took weeks to groove—early errors mounted.
- String Wear: Dense pattern snaps polys faster, upping maintenance costs.
- Intimidating Specs: Beginners balk at weight; even intermediates fatigue in long sets.
- Low Launch: Baseline drives require upward aim—net skimmers plagued my first sessions.
- Customization Must: Stock demands tweaks for balance; untuned, it twists on volleys.
The Head Prestige Tour’s allure fades under scrutiny if power’s your priority—it’s a purist’s dream, but everyday warriors feel the pinch. I grabbed the 2023 model hyped on its control legacy, but the power void hit hard: my semi-western forehands lacked zip, dying mid-court against pushers.
The 95-inch head’s tiny sweet spot amplified this; a half-inch miss sent slices sailing long, forcing conservative play. Spin? The tight 18×20 caps revolutions—my topspin backhands arced low, easy put-aways for foes.
Maneuverability challenged too; at 11.2 ounces strung, quick net rushes felt labored, swingweight (325) dragging on overheads. Serves required overhaul: flats worked, but kicks sat up flat, aces dipping. The 62 RA flex comforts arms but mutes pop—early matches, I over-hit to compensate, unforced errors spiking.
Adjustment curve? Steep—two weeks of drills to trust the low launch, aiming higher to avoid tape. Strings wore quick under tension, bed going mushy mid-session.
Fatigue set in during three-setters; the heft taxed shoulders, pace fading late. Visually stark, it lacked flair for motivation. Mods mitigated: handle weight lightened feel, tip lead boosted stability. Yet, these cons expose its niche—elite for technicians, taxing for mortals. It hones precision but exposes flaws, a tough teacher.
Comparison with Other Brands

- Vs. Wilson Blade 98: Radical edges in spin from its open pattern: Blade’s control matches, but Radical’s Auxetic adds comfort on long points, while Blade twists less on blocks.
- Vs. Babolat Pure Strike 98: Strike packs more pop: Radical’s stability shines defensively, but Strike’s stiffness (71 RA) launches higher—ideal if you crave free power over Radical’s tempered response.
- Vs. Yonex Ezone 98: Ezone feels livelier: Both maneuver well, but Ezone’s isometric head forgives mishits better; Radical counters with superior slice control for low balls.
- Vs. Tecnifibre TFight 305: TFight swings faster: Similar weights, but TFight’s foam fill boosts touch—Radical wins on durability, holding tension longer in humid conditions.
- Vs. Dunlop CX 200: CX offers plush flex: Radical’s power blend suits all-court better; CX demands more arm for spin, while Radical’s 16×19 grabs easier.
The Head Radical stands tall against rivals, but pitting it analytically reveals nuanced edges. Take the Wilson Blade 98—both 98-inch control frames, yet Radical’s 16×19 bites spin higher, my forehands dipping sharper than Blade’s tighter 18×20.
Blade’s crisp feedback edges volleys, but Radical’s Auxetic damps better for elbow health. Against Babolat Pure Strike 98, the Strike’s 71 RA stiffness erupts power—great for flat hitters—but Radical’s 66 RA tempers it, preventing overshoots in wind.
Yonex Ezone 98? Livelier launch from its isometric shape boosts confidence on off-centers; I netted fewer there, but Radical sliced lower, carving defensive winners. Tecnifibre TFight 305 swings whippy, foam enhancing touch on serves—my kicks curved more—but Radical endured string beds longer, fewer mid-match swaps.
Dunlop CX 200’s 63 RA flex feels buttery, ideal for feel players; Radical counters with balanced power, plowing baselines deeper without fatigue.
Overall, Radical’s versatility trumps specialized foes—spin vs. Blade, stability vs. Strike, forgiveness vs. Ezone. It’s the all-rounder for 4.0s evolving, blending Head’s tech with broad appeal. (Word count: 356)
Also Read: My Thoughts on Pikkl Hurricane Pro
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Yes, pros like Andy Murray and Sloane Stephens use Radical variants for their balanced power and control.
Absolutely, the Prestige Tour excels in precision and feel for advanced players, offering top-tier stability and volley touch.
Yes, the Radical is an excellent all-around racket, blending spin, power, and comfort for intermediate to advanced users.
Yes, the IG Radical remains a classic, praised for its plush feel, spin, and versatility in older reviews.
Conclusion
You know that moment when the racket clicks, turning average rallies into statement wins? That’s the Head Radical for me—versatile, forgiving yet firm, pushing you to play smarter. If you’re grinding baselines or mixing net rushes, grab it; it’ll reward your hustle with spin and stability that feels earned. Don’t sleep on customizing for your swing—it’s the frame that grows with you, making every match a step up.
Imagine a racket that demands your best but delivers poetry in return—pure, unfiltered control that carves points like a master. That’s the Head Prestige Tour for you, the choice if precision is your obsession and power comes from within. Advanced warriors, this one’s yours: trust its feel, hone your angles, and watch opponents unravel. It’s not easy, but nothing great is—step up, and own the court.