Asics is one of the most popular running shoe brands, known for their responsive cushioning and durable construction. Two of their flagship stability models are the Cumulus and GT 2000 series. But what’s the difference between the Cumulus and GT 2000? And which one is better for your needs?
Both the Cumulus and GT 2000 are stability running shoes designed for mild to moderate overpronators. They provide arch support and help guide your foot motion in a more neutral direction. However, there are some key differences between the two models:
A Brief Comparison Table
| Feature | Asics Cumulus | Asics GT 2000 |
| Cushioning | Soft, bouncy FlyteFoam midsole. More overall cushioning. | Firmer dual-density foam. Structured feel. |
| Stability | Moderate stability features. Relies more on arch support in insole. | Maximum stability from technologies like DuoMax. Designed for severe overpronators. |
| Weight | Typically lighter, around 10.1 oz for men’s size 9. | Heavier, around 11 oz for men’s size 9. |
| Fit | Runs long and narrow. Adaptable fit. | True to size. Snug midfoot wrap. |
| Use Cases | Recovery runs, long miles, easy paces. | Tempo workouts, faster training, races up to half marathon. |
| Ideal For | Neutral runners seeking soft cushioning. Mild overpronators. | Moderate to severe overpronators needing structure. |
Cushioning
The Cumulus features Asics’ FlyteFoam technology which gives it an exceptionally soft and bouncy feel underfoot. It has more overall cushioning than the GT 2000 making it the softer, more flexible option of the two.
The GT 2000 uses a dual-density midsole foam which is firmer and more structured. There’s still decent cushioning but it has a more directed, guiding feel compared to the softer Cumulus.
Winner: Cumulus for soft, cloud-like cushioning. GT 2000 for firmer structured support.
Stability
While both shoes offer pronation control, the GT 2000 is considered the more stable option. It uses proprietary technologies like DuoMax and Dynamic DuoMax which increase support through the instep and arch. The result is a shoe that strongly discourages inward rolling of the foot.
The Cumulus still provides good stability but relies more on the arch support built into the insole. The midsole is also a bit softer and flexible so there’s less resistance against foot motion.
Winner: GT 2000 for runners who need stricter pronation control. Cumulus offers a moderate level of support.
Also Read: Comparison Between Taos Star And Plim Soul.
Weight
The Cumulus tends to be slightly lighter than the GT 2000. For example, a men’s size 9 Cumulus 24 weighs around 10.1 oz while the GT 2000 10 weighs 11 oz. It’s not a huge difference but the Cumulus does have a feather-like feel during transitions and faster paces.
Winner: Cumulus is lighter weight.
Fit And Sizing
The Cumulus runs slightly long and narrow. Meanwhile, the GT 2000 fits true to size for most runners. Both shoes come in a variety of width options from narrow to extra wide.
The GT 2000 frequently has a more secure midfoot wrap as a result of its various stability features. But it also has a firmer feel that some find restrictive. The more pliable Cumulus adapts better to different foot shapes.
Winner: Cumulus for adjustable fit. GT 2000 for secure midfoot hold.
Traction And Durability
Asics uses their tried and true AHAR rubber on both models which provides excellent grip on roads and trails. Both also feature plastic shanks for torsional rigidity in the midfoot.
Durability is quite equal as well. The ample rubber coverage protects high wear areas. Expect 300-500 miles out of each shoe before signs of significant midsole breakdown.
Winner: It’s a tie! Both have great traction and durability.
Pricing
The Cumulus and GT 2000 cost the same at $130 MSRP. That’s reasonable for the technology and quality you’re getting. Often colors from past seasons can be found on sale.
Winner: Tie again! You get a lot of performance for the price with either shoe.
Also Read: Choose Between Hey Dude And Wally Sox.
Cumulus Vs. GT 2000 – Which Is Right For You?
So with all the similarities and differences considered, which Asics shoe is the right choice? Here are some general guidelines:
- Cumulus is best for neutral runners seeking soft, lightweight cushioning. It can work for mild overpronators as well.
- GT 2000 is ideal for moderate to severe overpronators needing more arch support and structure. It’s also great for runners prone to knee or IT band issues.
- Choose Cumulus for recovery days, long runs, and easy mileage. It offers flexibility and comfort over extra stability.
- Pick GT 2000 for tempo workouts, speed training, races up to half marathon distance. The firmer platform provides a responsive, propulsive feel.
- Try the Cumulus if you like a soft, conforming fit. Go with GT 2000 for those wanting a snugger midfoot wrap.
- Cumulus will suit most foot types but especially narrow or low-volume feet. GT 2000 is better for flatter arches.
While the GT 2000 may work for more overpronation, don’t assume it’s automatically better if you roll in slightly. The right amount of pronation control is key so consider your needs carefully. Don’t overlook the versatile, well-cushioned Cumulus.
Also Read: Comparison Between Nortiv 8 and Columbia
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
The main differences are that the Cumulus has a softer, more cushioned midsole while the GT 2000 has a firmer ride with more pronation control. The Cumulus is lighter and more flexible too.
Some top alternatives to consider are the Brooks Ghost, Nike Pegasus, Saucony Ride, New Balance 880, and Mizuno Wave Rider. All provide a balanced, cushioned ride that works for most runners.
The GT 2000 works great for runners who overpronate and need stability and structure without an overly rigid feel. It’s also a good choice for races from 5K to half marathon distances.
Cumulus is a versatile neutral shoe that can work for a wide range of runners. It’s best for those focused on cushioning and shock absorption. It also suits mild overpronators who don’t need heavy stability features.
Also Read: Is Sperry Tarpon Better Than Billfish?
Conclusion
In the battle of Asics Cumulus versus GT 2000, there’s no single winner. Both are excellent stability shoes in their own right. Pick Cumulus if you want soft, flexible cushioning with moderate support. Choose GT 2000 for firmer stability and pronation control.
Consider your foot type, gait, and running needs. Either way, you’ll be getting a comfortable, durable ride in these Asics running shoes. Give them both a try to see which feels best!