Personal locator beacons (PLBs) are essential pieces of safety equipment for anyone venturing into the outdoors. The ACR ResQLink 400 and 425 are two popular models, but what exactly sets them apart?
This comprehensive guide compares the key features, pros, cons, and FAQs to help you determine which ResQLink PLB best fits your needs.
A Brief Comparison Table
| Feature | ResQLink 400 | ResQLink 425 |
| Weight | 5.8 oz | 6.4 oz |
| Size | 5.0” x 2.3” x 1.3” | 5.8” x 1.9” x 1.1” |
| Battery | Non-hazmat lithium | Rechargeable lithium-ion |
| Battery Life | 5 years | Recharges in 46 hours |
| Waterproof | 16.4 ft for 1 hour | 16.4 ft for 1 hour |
| Buoyancy | Floats | Floats |
| Frequency | 406 MHz & 121.5 MHz | 406 MHz & 121.5 MHz |
| GPS | 66 channel | 66 channel |
| Strobe Light | Yes | Yes |
| Reflector | Yes | Yes |
| Test Function | Yes | Yes |
| Warranty | 5 years | 5 years |
Overview of the ResQLink 400
The ResQLink 400 is ACR’s entry-level PLB model. It offers reliable performance packed into an ultra compact and lightweight build.
- Small and lightweight at just 5.8 ounces
- Measures 5.0” x 2.3” x 1.3”, easily fits in a pocket
- Non-hazardous lithium battery lasts 5 years
- Waterproof up to 16.4 feet for 1 hour
- Floats and is highly visible neon yellow
- Strobe light and reflector aids visibility
- 66 channel GPS with proven accuracy
- Transmits distress signal on 406 MHz and 121.5 MHz
- Self-test feature
- 5 year warranty
Overall, the ResQLink 400 provides core safety features in a streamlined package. It’s affordably priced and perfect for recreational boaters, paddlers, hikers, climbers, and more.
Overview of the ResQLink 425
The ResQLink 425 builds on the 400 with some extra capabilities for more advanced users.
- Slightly heavier at 6.4 ounces
- Larger in size at 5.8” x 1.9” x 1.1”
- Lithium-ion battery recharges in 46 hours
- Same 16.4 foot waterproof rating
- High visibility neon yellow with floatation
- Identical 66 channel GPS functionality
- Same 406 MHz and 121.5 MHz frequencies
- Additional strobe light modes
- More memory for longer satellite messaging
- Doubles as a GPS compass
- Higher price point than 400
With rechargeability and expanded features, the ResQLink 425 appeals to those needing maximum performance. It offers an incremental upgrade over the 400.
Also Read: Comparison Between Cobra RAD 480i and Uniden R3
Key Differences Between the ResQLink 400 and 425
While the ResQLink 400 and 425 share similar designs focused on compact, lightweight, and reliable PLB functionality, there are some important distinctions between the two models.
- Battery Type and Lifespan
ResQLink 400 is equipped with a non-rechargeable lithium battery, boasting a reassuring lifespan of 5 years. This feature guarantees long-term reliability, especially vital for those who venture into remote locations.
On the other hand, ResQLink 425 takes a modern approach with a rechargeable lithium-ion pack. This battery can be fully recharged in just 46 hours, offering convenience and sustainability.
The rechargeable nature of the 425’s battery ensures that users can keep their devices powered consistently, essential for frequent adventurers.
- Size and Weight
Size and weight are critical factors for portable devices like PLBs. The ResQLink 400 is the more compact and lighter option, weighing in at 5.8 oz and measuring 5.0” x 2.3” x 1.3”. This makes it an excellent choice for minimalists who prefer to travel light.
Conversely, the ResQLink 425 is slightly larger and heavier, weighing 6.4 oz with dimensions of 5.8” x 1.9” x 1.1”.
The additional size and weight are due to the extra internal memory and enhanced strobe light features incorporated in the 425, offering more advanced functionalities for users.
- Core Rescue Functionality
Both the 400 and 425 models excel in their core rescue functionalities. They broadcast emergency signals on the 406 MHz distress frequency, which is monitored by search and rescue personnel worldwide.
This feature is crucial as it ensures that users’ GPS positions are beamed accurately to responders within 110 yards.
Additionally, the devices are equipped with a 121.5 MHz homing frequency, allowing rescuers to home-in once they’ve received the initial 406 MHz alert and are nearby.
When activated, both models send out 8 bursts over 2 minutes on 406 MHz at a 5W power output, maximizing the chances of being located quickly.
- Visibility Features
Visibility is paramount in rescue scenarios. Both PLBs feature blinking strobe lights and reflective material to enhance visibility.
The ResQLink 425, however, offers additional strobe light patterns and options, providing increased visibility and signaling versatility in varied situations.
- Water Resistance and Floating Capability
For aquatic adventurers, water resistance is a non-negotiable feature. Both the ResQLink 400 and 425 maintain signal integrity underwater and will float when surfaced, with IP68 water ratings up to 16.4 ft for 1 hour.
This feature ensures that whether you’re kayaking, boating, or fishing, you can rely on these devices in wet conditions.
- Supplementary Features
The ResQLink 425 stands out with its supplementary features. It adds a GPS compass and basic navigation functionalities, allowing users to orient a map and set waypoints.
These features are valuable for individuals who need additional guidance in wilderness settings. In contrast, the ResQLink 400 is more focused on core PLB/distress functionality, making it a straightforward, reliable option.
- Internal Memory and Messaging
Communication is key in emergencies. The ResQLink 425 doubles the internal memory, enabling users to transmit longer personalized messages with the satellite 406 MHz burst.
Providing search and rescue personnel with more context about your situation can be invaluable. The ResQLink 400, however, offers limited message capacity, focusing on transmitting core details like name and contact info.
- Accessories and Bundles
ACR offers similar accessory options for both models, such as cases and mounting hardware. The distinctive feature is that the ResQLink 425 can be paired with a dedicated smart charger as a bundle, adding to its convenience and usability.
- Cost Consideration
Budget plays a significant role in decision-making. The ResQLink 400 is more affordable, offering core capabilities for users who need reliable, basic functionality.
The ResQLink 425, with its additional features and rechargeability, demands a higher investment, making it suitable for those looking for more advanced options.
Overall, the ResQLink 400 and 425 offer comparable performance across the metrics most crucial in a PLB. The key differences come down to battery type, size, some bonus features on the 425, and cost. Choosing between them depends largely on budget and how advanced your needs are.
Also Watch This Review Video:
Pros and Cons of the ResQLink 400
Pros
- Compact and lightweight
- Simple one-button operation
- Affordable price point
- 5 year battery lifespan
- Floats and is highly waterproof
- Transmits to global 406 MHz and 121.5 MHz
- Accurate GPS positioning
- Easy self-test feature
- Durable construction
- 5 year warranty
Cons
- Limited satellite messaging capacity
- No rechargeable battery option
- Lacks navigation features
- Less robust strobe light modes
- Not expandable or upgradable
Pros and Cons of the ResQLink 425
Pros
- Rechargeable lithium-ion battery
- Larger internal memory for messaging
- GPS compass for basic navigation
- Additional strobe light modes
- More advanced capabilities
- Doubles as a GPS device
Cons
- Heavier than the 400
- Larger in size than the 400
- Higher price point
- Recharging requires extra peripheral
- Overkill for some basic users
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Yes, the ResQLink 400 carries an IP68 waterproof rating. It will maintain signal integrity and can withstand submersion down to 16.4 feet for up to 1 hour without leakage. This makes it fully functional even in wet conditions or underwater.
The 400 uses a non-rechargeable lithium battery pack rated to last 5 years before requiring replacement. With typical use, you can expect the battery to last approximately 5 years until its expiration date. How frequently it is tested and activated will impact overall battery performance.
The ResQLink 410 is an older discontinued model while the 425 is the newer, upgraded version. Key differences include: 410 uses alkaline batteries instead of rechargeable lithium-ion, 410 is slightly larger and heavier. 425 adds more memory, GPS compass, extra strobe modes, 425 uses latest electronic components. For most users, the 425 is the better choice over the outdated 410 model.
ACR recommends briefly testing your 400 every 6 months at a minimum. To test: Take the device outdoors with a clear view of the sky, Hold vertically with antenna pointed up, Press and hold the button for 1 second (do not let go), The strobe will start blinking to confirm test signal sent, Release button after test completion. Keep in mind that testing too frequently can drain the battery. Also never test indoors as it may actually transmit the distress signal.
Final Thoughts
For most recreational users, the ResQLink 400 is the ideal choice that packs reliable PLB performance into an affordable and compact package.
The upgrades on the 425 like rechargeability and more advanced features cater better to professional guides, mariners, and others needing expanded capability.
Ultimately, the core life-saving distress functions work similarly on both models. By understanding your budget and specific needs, you can determine whether the ResQLink 400 or 425 is the best personal locator beacon for you.